The knowledge engine

The information layer in this field got worse.

More content, less of it checked. Some of it synthetic. Some carrying precise figures that trace back to nothing at all.

The four engines →

A separate publication · public · graded

01Why it exists

Because scepticism is now the rational default.

Anyone working seriously in this field has had the experience of tracing a confident statistic back through three articles to a source that does not say it. That is not an occasional annoyance any more — it is the condition of the information layer.

Curated Health is a record rather than a set of opinions. Curated sources across market access, evidence, regulatory and the state of AI in regulated work — each one graded, dated, and traceable to where it came from.

Where something cannot be verified, it is marked as unverified rather than smoothed into a claim. That is the whole editorial policy.

02What it publishes

Sources first, analysis second.

Curated sources

What is genuinely worth reading this month, with provenance attached and the reason it was selected stated.

Landscape analysis

What actually changed in a jurisdiction, a therapy area or a regulatory position — as distinct from what was announced.

AI in regulated work

A running view, including the parts that are not working. Failure reporting is scarce in this category and disproportionately useful.

Method notes

How we grade, what we count as primary, and where our own confidence is thin.

03The loop

It feeds the other three engines.

What is curated here becomes grounding for the work — and what the work produces, where it is publishable and carries no client material, comes back out.

That loop is the reason it is a separate publication and not a blog. A marketing blog argues a position. This one keeps a record, and a record is only useful if it is maintained whether or not it is convenient.

Our own positions and arguments live separately, signed by whoever wrote them.